In this episode, Keith discusses how to tackle public misconceptions of personal injury cases.   We break down: How to avoid a negative bias during jury selection and how to impart the value of their role to jury members.   Keith explores the importance of the civil justice system, the limits of the criminal justice system, and gets to the root of why personal injury law is such crucial work.   Subscribe for more episodes!   Have a case? We're happy to take a look here:   If you have a case that you think me or my team would be able to help you with or handle, you can reply to this email. You can email me:   I personally read every reply.     I'm now on LinkedIn, let's connect:    For more visit: 

Keith discusses a three-part framework for persuading through active listening.    When encountering opposing views in the courtroom and in life, Keith explores how understanding different sides of an argument can build strong cases and lead to peaceful resolutions.   Learn how temporarily removing notions of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’, stepping into opposing counsel’s shoes, and building arguments that address the defense’s perspective can change the outcome of a case.   Subscribe for more episodes!   Have a case? We're happy to take a look here:   If you have a case that you think me or my team would be able to help you with or handle, you can reply to this email. You can email me:   I personally read every reply.     I'm now on LinkedIn, let's connect:    For more visit: 

Keith discusses a framework for problem-solving that extends beyond the courtroom. Keith explores how to stand your ground when a seeming obstacle can in fact strengthen a client’s claim. For example, when it comes to injuries, many assume that preexisting health conditions are a deterrent for trial. Learn how reexamination of baseline, reserves, and coping abilities can shift perspective and how this insight can be used across multiple facets of life.   Subscribe for more episodes!   Have a case? We're happy to take a look here:   If you have a case that you think me or my team would be able to help you with or handle, you can reply to this email. You can email me:  I personally read every reply.     I'm now on LinkedIn, let's connect:    For more visit: 

Keith explores the psychology behind using familiar sayings to make pivotal points in ways that stick.   He bases his theory on the idea that people embrace old adages because they have roots in their childhood, and bring a level of comfort to the conversation, making the speaker seem naturally trustworthy.   Trust is vital in the courtroom, and can easily make or break a case.   The conversation is between Keith and Jason Ingber, Director of Legal Services at Morgan & Morgan of LA.   Subscribe for more episodes!   Have a case? We're happy to take a look here:   f you have a case that you think me or my team would be able to help you with or handle, you can reply to this email. You can email me:  I personally read every reply.     I'm now on LinkedIn, let's connect:    For more visit: 

Keith teaches his secret formula to harness the power of words to communicate, convince, and persuade. Keith believes that we are all wordsmiths, and the better we become at our craft, the more successful we will be in the courtroom and in life. Hear Keith explain different types of words, and how connotations can subconsciously hurt or help your case.   If you have a case that you think me or my team would be able to help you with or handle, you can reply to this email. You can email me:  I personally read every reply.     I'm now on LinkedIn, let's connect:    For more visit: 

When the defense uses statements from your client about improvements in their condition to suggest her or she isn’t really hurt, remind the jury those words are badges of honesty, they are not the words of an exaggerator.   If you have a case that you think me or my team would be able to help you with or handle, you can reply to this email. You can email me:  I personally read every reply.     I'm now on LinkedIn, let's connect:      For more visit:   

When the defense uses statements from your client about improvements in their condition to suggest her or she isn’t really hurt, remind the jury those words are badges of honesty, they are not the words of an exaggerator.

How to explain to potential jurors that it is easier said than done to hold the burden of proof down to "more likely than not" when that person believes the burden should be higher. I'm now on LinkedIn, let's connect: https://bit.ly/KeithOnLinkedIn For more visit: https://keithmitnik.com

How to explain to potential jurors that it is easier said than done to hold the burden of proof down to "more likely than not" when that person believes the burden should be higher.   I'm now on LinkedIn, let's connect:    For more visit: 

How to stop the defense from seating biased jurors by explaining that bias does not cause people to ignore evidence, rather it impacts conclusions from the evidence.   I'm now on LinkedIn, let's connect:  For more visit:     

How to stop the defense from seating biased jurors by explaining that bias does not cause people to ignore evidence, rather it impacts conclusions from the evidence. I'm now on LinkedIn, let's connect: https://bit.ly/KeithOnLinkedIn For more visit: https://keithmitnik.com