What is a patent post-grant supplemental reexamination? Once your patent has been issued, sometimes you might want to have the Patent Office take a second a look to see if it really should have been issued in the first place. Why would you want to do this? One reason is that it can make invalidating your patent harder to do by others, and second, you can avoid the dreaded "Fraud on the Patent Office." Listen to the episide to find out more!

Connect with Adam Diament

E-mail:

[email protected]

Website:

https://www.nolanheimann.com/legal-team/adam-diament

Phone/Text:

(424)281-0162

YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5cTADZzJfPoyQMjnW-rtRw

Instagram:

https://www.instagram.com/trademarkpatentlaw/

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/adam-diament-j-d-ph-d-180a005/

Amazon Book Page:

https://www.amazon.com/stores/author/B005SV2RZC/allbooks?ingress=0&visitId=831aff71-513b-4158-ad73-386ede491e93

There are some tricky situations when it comes to the absolute final time for you to submit a document to the Patent Office. Is the final deadline based on the time zone you're in? Based on the time zone of the Patent Office? Based on whether you submit electronically or mail from the post office? Do international patent applications have different rules from U.S. patent applications? Learn all of this and more with this week's episode! 

Connect with Adam Diament

E-mail: [email protected]

Website: https://www.nolanheimann.com/legal-team/adam-diament

Phone/Text: (424)281-0162

YouTube Channel

LinkedIn

Instagram

If you disclose your product or sell it before you have a patent application on file, you may be barred from getting a patent due to the on-sale bar doctrine. But what if you have a secret METHOD, like a secret way to age steaks to make them more delicious, and you never disclosed or sold that that METHOD even though you sold the steaks? Does the on-sale bar apply to getting a patent for your secret METHOD or just apply to the physical steaks? A new case just cleared up this grey area. Listen to the episode and find out the answer!

Connect with Adam Diament

E-mail: [email protected]

Website: https://www.nolanheimann.com/legal-team/adam-diament

Phone/Text: (424)281-0162

YouTube Channel

LinkedIn

In this episode I go over Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) are FRAND (Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory) terms.

If someone comes up with a patent for a technology, and that technology because a standard for an industry, then the company that owns the patent MUST adhere to FRAND principals by licensing it on a "Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminary" basis. Listen to the episode for more details and examples!

Connect with Adam Diament

E-mail: [email protected]

Website: https://www.nolanheimann.com/legal-team/adam-diament

Phone/Text: (424)281-0162

YouTube Channel

LinkedIn

A new treaty was adopted by the World Intellectual Property Organization about using knowledge and resources from indigenous people. This may have an effect on drug patents, where the initial knowledge of the drug comes from indigenous cultures, and the plants they use to treat ailments.  Listen to this episode to learn more about the treaty and how it affects disclosure requirements when you file a patent application.

-----------------

Connect with Adam Diament

E-mail: [email protected]

Website: https://www.nolanheimann.com/legal-team/adam-diament

Phone/Text: (424)281-0162

YouTube Channel

LinkedIn

There is a new standard for determining whether a design is obvious (and not patentable).  The "old" rigid test called the Rosen-Durling test has been supplanted by a more flexible approach under the recently decided case of LKQ Corporation vs GM Global Technology Operations LLC. In this episode, learn how this new test is applied and why more of your design patent applications might get rejected for obviousness.

-------

E-mail: [email protected]

Website: https://www.nolanheimann.com/legal-team/adam-diament

Phone/Text: (424)281-0162

YouTube Channel

LinkedIn

In this episode I go over a doctrine in patent law called the "Printed Matter Doctrine." You generally can't get a patent on something if the only difference is that you provided some written instructions on your product, even if those written instructions are new and non-obvious.  Learn what kinds of printed matter is and isn't patent eligible in this episode.

Connect with Adam Diament

E-mail: [email protected]

Website: https://www.nolanheimann.com/legal-team/adam-diament

Phone/Text: (424)281-0162

YouTube Channel

LinkedIn

In this episode of the "Patenting for Inventors Podcast" I discuss why I get excited when I see a phone call coming from the 571 area code. Usually it means a patent examiner is calling me to make an "Examiner's Amendment." Why is that good and what are examiner amendments about? Listen to the latest episode and learn!

Links:

E-mail: [email protected]

Website: https://www.nolanheimann.com/legal-team/adam-diament

Phone/Text: (424)281-0162

YouTube Channel

LinkedIn

Your patent application can be rejected because your so-called invention is "obvious." But how is obviousness determined? What's the difference between "prior art" that can be cited to reject your invention for lack of novelty, and "analogous art" which is the requirement to reject your invention based on obviousness?  Listen to this episode and find out!

---

Links:

E-mail: [email protected]

Website: https://www.nolanheimann.com/legal-team/adam-diament

Phone/Text: (424)281-0162

YouTube Channel

LinkedIn

The law may be changing soon on how to determine whether your new design is patentable. Learn what the controversy is behind the patentability standard for design patent obviousness. Does the case of KSR v. Teleflex apply to design patents like it does for utility patents. Or will the Rosen/Durling Test still reign supreme! 

---

E-mail: [email protected]

Website: https://www.nolanheimann.com/legal-team/adam-diament

Phone/Text: (424)281-0162

YouTube Channel

LinkedIn