If you would prefer not to learn about Jim’s upcoming drive to Ohio and the family change of plans also sending him to Massachusetts, you can skip to (10:00).

Chris’s Summary
Jim and I walk through retirement milestone ages, from age 21, when a minor child beneficiary’s stretch gives way to the 10-year rule, through catch-up contributions, penalty-free withdrawal ages, Social Security survivor and retirement claiming ages, the IRMAA lookback at 63, Medicare at 65, QCDs at 70½, and RMDs at 73 or 75. We also cover an obscure age 75 RMD rule for pre-1987 403(b) contributions and the age 85 limit for starting a QLAC.

Jim’s “Pithy” Summary
Chris and I work through a list of retirement milestone ages I’ve been holding onto for a while, and the first stop, age 21, is a deep one. Folks, the stretch IRA is the Black Knight from Monty Python and the Holy Grail. It’s gravely wounded, but it’s not gone. A minor child of the deceased IRA owner, an eligible designated beneficiary, or as I call it, an eligible human, can still stretch until 21. Then the 10-year rule applies, and Chris and I guessed wrong on what happens next. I checked with the Ed Slott Group, and the answer comes down to one phrase: at least as rapidly.

Then we hit catch-up contributions at 50, including a new Roth rule this year that some listeners call a loophole. I don’t. We cover the carve-out that lets public safety employees skip the 10% early withdrawal penalty at 50, and the rule of 55, including a strategy the IRS has implicitly blessed. And then there’s the super catch-up. Folks, I have no idea what Congress was thinking. An extra $3,250 a year in your 60s is not going to fix anybody’s retirement. Let people in their 20s and 30s put more in, where it can compound. Chris brings in the Social Security and IRMAA ages, including a disabled surviving spouse rule that taught both of us something new.

At 70½, QCDs can help at the margins when a big RMD threatens an IRMAA tier. I make Chris guess an obscure age 75 rule tied to 403s, and he earns a B+. Then he pulls out one I totally missed at 85: QLACs. I give Treasury credit here, not Congress, and I explain why we’re a little softer on QLACs than on other deferred income annuities.

The post Retirement Milestone Ages: EDU #2639 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.

Jim and Chris discuss listener emails on the best month to claim Social Security, IRMAA strategy for married couples, Social Security ex-spouse benefits, inflation and annuity purchase decisions for a Minimum Dignity Floor shortfall, and Minimum Dignity Floor tax calculations.

(9:30) A listener asks whether there is a best month to apply for Social Security benefits before age 70, given how often benefits are calculated.

(20:00) George wants to know whether the SSA-44 IRMAA strategy applies to married couples filing jointly, and whether a spouse delaying retirement until mid-January would allow a large Roth conversion that year without that conversion triggering IRMAA later.

(29:30) The guys are asked to clarify ex-spouse benefit figures a Social Security agent gave a listener’s sister-in-law, including whether she can claim spousal benefits without starting her own and whether the numbers indicate she was the higher earner.

(47:30) Jim and Chris field a question on how to account for future inflation when making an annuity purchase to cover a Minimum Dignity Floor shortfall.

(1:10:30) A final email wonders why the Minimum Dignity Floor calculation doesn’t simply account for the taxes owed on that income separate from Fun Number spending.

The post Social Security, IRMAA, Annuity Purchase, MDF Calculations: Q&A #2639 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.

Chris’s Summary
Jim and I use a Life Annuity Specialist article on pension risk transfer mortality models to examine longevity risk for individual retirees. These models weigh sub-ZIP codes, income, and over 200 socioeconomic factors, suggesting some retirees may live more than 10 years past age-65 life expectancy. We discuss why a household is a risk pool of one, why projections should reach well into the 90s, and why advocacy matters as the tax planning window closes.

Jim’s “Pithy” Summary
Chris and I dig into an article from Life Annuity Specialist, and no, this is not an annuity discussion. It covers a new approach to mortality tables that a consulting firm built to help insurers price pension risk transfers, and I’m not a fan of those, as you know. What amazed me was how granular it gets: sub-ZIP codes, pension size, blue-collar versus white-collar, and a model trained on millions of life years of data.

Here’s the thing, folks. The subset of the population this model says will live longer is pretty much those of you listening to this podcast. You VGers, you do-it-yourselfers, you’re more likely to have taken care of your health and followed what Dr. Phillip Snider shares about healthspan, not just lifespan. These risk tables let insurance companies handle that uncertainty because they’re spreading it across thousands of people, so no single long life throws them off. You don’t get that luxury. You’re a risk pool of one, a zebra on the Serengeti trying to survive outside the herd. You can pool longevity and cash flow through an annuity if you want, but you cannot pool your cognitive ability or your ability to avoid fraud.

Whether or not you ever buy a lifetime stream of guaranteed income to protect your Minimum Dignity Floor, that’s up to you. What we talk about in this episode is longevity risk that goes beyond outliving your money. Who is going to advocate for you at 85, 90, 95? Who updates your power of attorney, checks your beneficiaries, and looks out for the surviving spouse who was never into this stuff? As the tax planning window closes, the need for advocacy grows, and many of you are going to live a lot longer than you think.

The post Longevity Risk Beyond Money: EDU # 2638 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.

Chris and Jacob discuss listener emails on Social Security survivor benefits, a TIPS ladder paired with a QLAC, investment positioning across taxable, tax deferred, and tax-free accounts, and buffered ETFs for sequence of returns risk.

(12:30) A listener whose spouse recently died asks whether they can claim child in care survivor benefits now while caring for their young daughter, and whether claiming now would affect their own survivor benefit at full retirement age.

(25:00) George asks for feedback on a TIPS ladder that runs only to age 79, with an extra amount set aside at 75 to buy a QLAC that begins paying at 80 and covers the Minimum Dignity Floor from there.

(48:15) The guys take a question on how to position a $2.8 million portfolio split evenly between taxable, tax deferred, and tax free accounts when funding spending and weighing tax implications.

(1:05:15) Chris and Jacob respond to a question about using buffered ETFs to help manage sequence of returns risk.

The post Social Security, TIPS Ladder, Investment Positioning, Buffered ETFs: Q&A #2638 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.

Chris’s Summary
Jim and I discuss five common power of attorney mistakes flagged in an estate planning attorney’s article, along with points from Peter Scott. We cover naming an alternative agent, the friction a springing agency can create, gifting authority that is either absent or overly broad, notifying old agents and financial institutions after a change, and the boilerplate real estate language that title companies may refuse to accept.

Jim’s “Pithy” Summary
Chris and I go through an article timestamped December 2022, one of the 72 sitting in my iPad folder, where an estate planning attorney lists her five biggest mistakes to avoid with a financial power of attorney. I’m not an attorney, nor do I play one on TV, but I’ve been in this industry 27 going on 28 years and we deal with these forms quite often. I read her five, opine on them, and Chris weighs in after each. I also bring in Peter Scott, who shared with us on this show before he retired, because Pete flagged two of these as the big ones.

Her list covers backup agents, springing powers, gifting authority, changing agents, and real estate. I used to be a fan of springing powers. I’m not anymore, and it was Pete who turned me around on it. I had never thought of it that way before. Gifting is the one I think gets overlooked most, and I use my own mother’s document to explain why, because what wasn’t in hers had me beside myself. It involved my sister, my niece and nephew, and a lot of college tuition. Chris adds that locking a document down too tightly can backfire just as badly, and suggests what to do with wishes that don’t fit into legal language.

We also get into why banks and financial institutions often refuse older forms, the Colorado law Pete said he could fly a 747 through, and two clients whose documents came from the exact same software, where one attorney took the time to do the job and the other just clicked print. Pete’s warning on real estate was about boilerplate language, and Chris explains why the address you use every day may not be the one that matters.

The post Power of Attorney Mistakes: EDU #2637 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.

Jim and Chris are again joined by Dr. Phillip Snider. They discuss listener emails on coronary artery calcium scoring, followed by a broader conversation on healthy aging. Dr. Snider revisits the five tests he recommended in a previous episode, explains what the calcium score ranges mean, and covers how to get the tests done. He then turns to the dietary patterns linked to a longer, healthier life and closes with where the evidence actually stands on the common supplements vitamin D, vitamin E, CoQ10, and beta-carotene.

(11:30) George shares that after requesting the five tests Dr. Snider recommended, his coronary artery calcium score came back high despite other excellent health markers, and he and his physician are now building a treatment plan.

(29:00) A listener who is a retired emergency physician offers a different view on the calcium score, arguing that testing asymptomatic people carries risks of its own.

The post Heart Screening, Healthy Aging in Retirement: Q&A #2637 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.

Chris’s Summary
Jim and I continue our Fun Number series with a listener email laying out a DIY retirement plan built account by account, each with an assigned purpose. We cover where her approach lines up with positioning dollars by spending need, where tax planning could change what comes from which account, and how declining ability to manage money shaped her decisions.

Jim’s “Pithy” Summary
Chris and I get back to the series we interrupted, this time with a long email from a listener who has done the work herself and laid the whole thing out for us. She is retiring next year, she has been tracking her actual spending for years, and she has built a DIY retirement plan that throws out the two rules of thumb she started with a decade ago. I have never understood where that 75 to 80 percent of income number came from. Your mortgage or rent and your utilities do not shrink because you stopped working, and the money you were putting into the 401k does not vanish. It goes to fun.

Where she really got my attention is that she gave every account a job. She has a good life account, a reserve for emergencies, aging and long term care, one for charitable giving, and one that exists to be spent. That is her version of what we do, and I like it. I do have a couple of caveats, and one of them I feel strongly enough about that I went looking for the sound effect button. It has to do with which account the charitable dollars should come from.

We also get into what she calls the basics of life, which is close to what we call the Minimum Dignity Floor, why positions get etched in Jell-O and not in stone, the studies on when your ability to handle this material peaks and why your confidence never gets the memo, and the question of who her tax planning is actually for.

The post Review of a DIY Retirement Plan: EDU #2636 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.

Jim and Chris discuss listener emails on IRMAA brackets after a spouse’s death, Social Security claiming and spousal benefits, annuities and inflation for a Minimum Dignity Floor shortfall, and a Qualified Charitable Distributio (QCD) funding a charitable gift annuity, followed by listener PSAs on expense tracking, home sale timing, and annuity flexibility.

(10:00) A listener asks which year’s tax brackets and which filing status apply to the IRMAA two-year look-back following a spouse’s death, and whether remarrying later would change the result.

(18:30) George asks whether claiming Social Security at Full Retirement Age rather than 70 makes more sense when a spouse is already receiving a small benefit that would step up to a spousal benefit.

(32:15) The guys respond to a question about how to account for future inflation when purchasing an annuity to cover a Minimum Dignity Floor (MDF) shortfall.

(1:02:15) Jim and Chris address a question about using a QCD from a traditional IRA that contains basis to fund a charitable gift annuity. The listener asks how the basis affects the reportable QCD amount, any charitable deduction, and the taxation of the lifetime income stream.

(1:11:30) Georgette shares a listener PSA on using a budgeting app to tag every transaction as either MDF or Fun in the years leading up to retirement.

(1:13:00) A listener offers a PSA recommending a different approach – similar to what Jim is doing – for the homebuyer from a previous episode.

(1:15:00) The guys share a listener PSA suggesting a 60-day leaseback at closing as a simpler alternative to the 60-day rollover for that same home purchase situation.

(1:19:30) Jim and Chris close with a listener PSA suggesting that an annuity purchased for fun spending could also serve as a partial source of MDF income later if it structured differently.

The post IRMAA Brackets, Social Security, Annuity Inflation, QCDs, Listener PSAs: Q&A #2636 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.

Chris’s Summary
Jim and I are joined by Jacob as we tackle four listener questions on Investment Positioning , covering Quicken tools for tracking positions, funding a delay period Minimum Dignity Floor with a stable value fund, evaluating a too-good-to-be-true real estate return, and weighing a target date fund for long-term care reserves.

Jim’s “Pithy” Summary
Chris and I are joined by Jacob as we work through four listener emails, all circling back to how we think about Investment Positioning in retirement.

(6:45) One listener wants to know what Quicken features another listener used to track positions. Jacob reads the original listener’s own description of using Quicken to set up investment positions, plus separate categories for essential and discretionary spending.

(14:30) George wonders whether the stable value fund in his large 401(k) is principal protected enough to draw on. He and his wife are both 60 and plan to delay Social Security roughly 10 years, and he’s weighing this fund as the source to bridge that gap. Jacob and I dig into rate reset timing, liquidity restrictions, and mandatory withholding before landing on an answer.

(46:45) A listener asks whether a real estate offer promising 18 to 30 percent annual returns is worth pursuing. Chris lays out the single clearest test I’ve heard for spotting too-good-to-be-true returns.

(1:09:30) Georgette raises the question of parking her long-term care dollars in a 2040 target date fund. Jacob walks through how we tier the L in our SEAL Reserve by age instead of relying on one fund’s glide path, and I get into the real difference between a “to” fund and a “through” fund, including the story of a deputy sheriff who learned that difference the hard way.

The post Investment Positioning Questions: EDU #2635 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.

Jim and Chris discuss listener emails on Social Security survivor benefits and earnings records, financing a home purchase, and using a fixed indexed annuity (FIA) for discretionary spending.

(11:15) A listener asks why a Social Security estimate lists a $3,944 survivor benefit rather than the projected $5,101 age-70 benefit and which amount would actually be paid.

(21:45) The guys consider whether adding previously omitted stock option income to a 2017 earnings record could result in higher Social Security benefits and back pay.

(31:30) Jim and Chris weigh using a 60-day IRA or Roth IRA rollover to finance a home purchase before selling the current home against a HELOC or mortgage.

(55:15) Another listener asks for their thoughts on using a fixed indexed annuity (FIA) with an income rider to support discretionary spending and how it compares with their simpler annuity strategies.

The post Social Security, Social Security, Home Purchase, Fun Spending: Q&A #2635 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.

Chris’s Summary
Jim and I continue our discussion on the Fun Number, this time as a dialogue episode built around one listener’s hesitation around spending retirement savings and how growth and legacy positioning and establishing his SEAL Reserve helped him work through it. We revisit the seesaw framework for undeployed assets, clarify how the SEAL Reserve consolidated the old reserve positions, and explain why the Fun Vision is never set in stone and can and should be revisited.

Jim’s “Pithy” Summary
Chris and I are picking the Fun Number conversation back up in dialogue form this week, working through a long email from a listener whose growth and legacy positioning helped him get more comfortable with spending retirement savings after years of struggling to spend the money he worked his whole life to save. I have spent twenty-seven years questioning the safe withdrawal rate approach, and this listener took what we teach and reshaped it around his own need for peace of mind.

He admitted flat out that spending money is difficult for him, and I don’t think that makes him an anomaly. Honestly, that’s the norm for most people entering retirement. I compare it to growing lettuce in my own garden, nursing it from seed, only to cut it down and eat it. You still do it, but there is a pull to let it keep growing. That is why we built the Minimum Dignity Floor first: the older you gets an explicit promise that food, housing, and healthcare are covered no matter what, so the younger you can give yourself permission to spend on fun. This listener wanted more comfort than that alone gave him. So we walk through where that extra comfort came from for him.

The post Spending Retirement Savings: EDU #2634 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.