This special episode is being released across both Our Little Edey and Badge of Betrayal, as new information intersects with both stories  the death of Eden Westbrook and wider questions surrounding Tasmania Police.

A former Tasmania Police staff member shares what Sergeant Robert “Cookie” Cook told her about his time in St Helens, while another witness comes forward with fresh allegations and a disturbing memory involving “Kate.”

Plus, we bring you the latest developments from the parliamentary inquiry into Tasmania Police.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Camille Bianchi is a journalist and podcaster who has worked on a number of acclaimed crime series, including The Nurse, Inside the Tribe and Rotten Apple.

Her latest project is a little different.

Introducing Back to the Wall.

Serial killer Ivan Milat’s story is one of the most infamous in Australian history. So why are there still so many unanswered questions about his movements in the lead-up to his arrest in the 1990s?

Could his crimes have been covered up for decades? What was his connection to Kings Cross?

As those questions are examined by a New South Wales inquiry, Back to the Wall returns to the mad, bad old days of Sydney’s red-light district to explore where these claims came from.

Through the eyes of the street kids who were there, we hear about the QCs, the kids who lined “the Wall”, and the friends they never saw again.

History is told by the winners. But what if it wasn’t?

Get the first two episodes of Back to the Wall ad-free and early with an Apple Podcasts subscription from Monday, October 12. 

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this rush-release episode we delve into two submissions that were made public today in the government inquiry into Taspol. 

The first is from the DPP, and the second is from Taspol. It poses some interesting questions.

We also get more information from inside Taspol for 4 current serving officers, which again pose more questions.   

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Six months after first speaking to us anonymously, serving senior police officer “Tom” returns with new allegations about what happens inside Tasmania Police when misconduct involves senior ranks. He explains what he calls “off-book investigations” — matters allegedly handled outside normal reporting and oversight processes — and why he believes they can be used to avoid scrutiny. Tom also reveals the extraordinary position he now finds himself in: having spoken out to help expose these issues, he fears that his involvement in this podcast could complicate his ability to come forward to the parliamentary inquiry

SUPPORT OUR INVESTIGATION

Help us continue independent investigative reporting and get additional material, updates and early access through Podshape True Crime on Patreon.

Join Podshape True Crime on Patreon

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

CONTENT WARNING: This episode discusses allegations of sexual misconduct, workplace power imbalance and fear of reporting within policing. The allegations discussed have not been tested in court and have not been independently established. Identifying details have been deliberately withheld.

A detailed anonymous email lands with Badge of Betrayal, containing serious allegations involving a serving female police officer and a more senior colleague.

But this episode is about something bigger than one allegation.

What happens when a police officer believes the person they may need to report has more power inside the organisation than they do? Who can they safely turn to? And what happens when serious information is known inside an organisation, but never becomes a formal complaint?

We also return to our anonymous serving officer “Tom”, who tells us about something he describes as an “off-book investigation” — raising new questions about how allegations can be handled inside Tasmania Police and what records should exist when serious concerns are raised.

As the Parliamentary Inquiry into Tasmania Police responses to allegations of officer misconduct continues, we ask a fundamental question: can a junior police officer report someone at the top and genuinely believe there will be no repercussions?

SUPPORT OUR INVESTIGATION

Help us continue independent investigative reporting and get additional material, updates and early access through Podshape True Crime on Patreon.

Join Podshape True Crime on Patreon

SUPPORT

If anything raised in this episode affects you or someone you know, help is available.

State-Wide Sexual Assault Support Line — 1800 697 877
24/7 support in Tasmania through Sexual Assault Support Service and Laurel House.

1800RESPECT — 1800 737 732
Text 0458 737 732 for 24/7 domestic, family and sexual violence counselling and support.

1800RESPECT

Lifeline — 13 11 14
Text 0477 13 11 14 for 24/7 crisis support.

Lifeline Australia

If you or someone else is in immediate danger, call 000.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

CONTENT WARNING: This episode contains confronting and graphic descriptions of alleged child sexual abuse and sexual assault, including allegations involving a child, grooming, coercion and abuse by a person in a position of authority. It also contains discussion of suicide and police misconduct. Some listeners may find this episode extremely distressing. Please take care while listening and skip this episode if these subjects may be harmful or triggering for you.

Another serving Tasmanian police officer has come forward after listening to Badge of Betrayal.

Still wearing the badge today, he has asked us to protect his identity because he fears professional repercussions for speaking out. He tells us about the police academy instructor he once admired, behaviour he says he later witnessed, and the question that has stayed with him for more than 20 years: if Tasmania Police already knew of allegations or concerns, why was this officer ever placed in a position of authority over young recruits?

Our source has also provided information about separate allegations of misconduct involving other members of Tasmania Police. Those allegations are not connected to Paul Reynolds and, at this stage, have not all been independently verified. But they raise a broader question that has followed this investigation from the beginning: when serious allegations are made against police officers, who holds the police to account — and how does the public know that accountability has actually occurred?

Then, we return to a case first uncovered through documents obtained under Right to Information laws: former Tasmanian police officer Rex Klein. We can now reveal the disturbing allegations made against Klein by a woman who says the abuse began when she was just eight years old. 

Support Our Independent Storytelling on Patreon here 

SUPPORT

If this episode raises issues for you or someone you know, support is available.

1800RESPECT is Australia's national domestic, family and sexual violence counselling, information and support service. Call 1800 737 732 or text 0458 737 732. Support is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. (1800RESPECT)

For crisis support, contact Lifeline on 13 11 14 or text 0477 13 11 14. Lifeline is available 24/7.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The story of Paul Reynolds reaches into another Tasmanian case — the death of 15-year-old Eden Westbrook.

In this special crossover episode with Our Little Edey, Eden’s parents Jason and Amanda explain why they want to know exactly what Reynolds wrote, said and communicated while involved with Eden’s case and the coronial process.

We also examine police dispatch records from St Helens, previously unseen call-outs and questions surrounding the morning Eden was found.

Given everything now known about Reynolds, should every case he touched be independently reviewed?

Support Our Independent Storytelling on Patreon here 

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A new witness comes forward.

As Tasmania's Parliamentary Inquiry into police misconduct officially begins, we examine what it could mean for Badge of Betrayal, the questions it will investigate, and why parliamentary privilege may encourage more people to finally speak.

Then, an anonymous witness takes us back to Tasmania's notorious street groups of the 1970s and '80s, revealing what they knew about convicted child exploiter Gary Devine long before his crimes became public.

Finally, we revisit the unanswered mystery surrounding Paul Reynolds' desperate requests for $50,000, his contact with a criminal associate, and the connections that continue to emerge as this investigation unfolds

Support Our Independent Storytelling on Patreon here 

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

For 15 years, Tasmania Police said the matter was investigated.

Now, after months of Right to Information requests, Badge of Betrayal has obtained 61 pages of internal investigation files that have never been publicly examined in full.

Inside those documents are admissions from police officers who contacted escort services, records showing one officer made 34 contacts with prostitutes over a two-month period, evidence that an officer lied during the investigation, and an Integrity Commission intervention that forced Tasmania Police to reopen the case.

Then, in a Badge of Betrayal exclusive, a former correctional officer who worked inside Risdon Prison speaks publicly for the first time. After listening to this podcast, they contacted us with an account of conversations they say they had with Gary Devine while he was behind bars information they reported through official prison channels years ago but have never shared publicly until now.

This is one of the most significant episodes we've released.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this explosive episode of Badge of Betrayal, a former Tasmania Police officer who worked alongside Reynolds speaks publicly about the culture they witnessed firsthand. They describe allegations of bullying, intimidation and a workplace where many were too afraid to speak up.

The former officer also shares why they believe Reynolds was treated differently to others, raising serious questions about whether he was a protected figure within the organisation and how that may have influenced accountability.

This is a confronting firsthand account that sheds new light on the culture surrounding one of Tasmania Police's most controversial figures—and asks whether the system failed those who tried to challenge it.

Listener discretion is advised. The views expressed by interviewees are their own. Allegations discussed are presented as claims and opinions unless otherwise established by evidence or official findings.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A 12-year-old girl says she reported what happened on her walk home, but years later, she still wonders why nothing seemed to happen next. And Jacqui Lambie calls for an independent body to hold Tasmania Police to account; the same question keeps coming up: who investigates the investigators?

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.