- 52 minutes 53 secondsCommunicable E61: We will make you love PK/PD, part 3
In this episode of Communicable, Amy Legg (Brisbane, Australia), Rekha Pai Mangalore (Melbourne, Australia) & Angela Huttner (Geneva, Switzerland) return for the third part of the ‘We will make you love PK/PD’ series. The hosts are joined by two experts, Amanda Gwee (Melbourne, Australia) & Sebastian Wicha (Hamburg, Germany), to dive into an important application of PK/PD: model-informed precision dosing (MIPD), and how it allows for more informed, individualised dosing decisions. The episode also covers the open-access educational tools, KidsCalc and TDMx, developed by Gwee and Wicha respectively, and the steps clinicians can take to put MIPD into practice, keeping the individual patient at the centre of dosing decisions.
Resources
- TDMx, https://www.tdmx.eu/
- KidsCalc, https://www.kidscalc.org/
Further reading
- Broeker A, et al. Towards precision dosing of vancomycin: a systematic evaluation of pharmacometric models for Bayesian forecasting. CMI 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.02.029
- Brusamarello C, et al. How important are MIC determination methods when targeting vancomycin levels in patients with Staphylococcus aureus infections? J Antimicrob Chemother 2021. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab065
- De Cock PA, et al. Bedside model-informed precision dosing of vancomycin in severely ill neonates and children in Belgium (the BENEFICIAL trial): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2026. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-4642(25)00385-2
- Gwee A, et al. Identifying a therapeutic target for vancomycin against staphylococci in young infants. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab469
- Haiping X, et al. Model-informed precision dosing of vancomycin in children 3 months to 18 years of age using Australia-wide data. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2026. DOI: 10.1128/aac.01840-25
- Harwood K, et al. Refining Absolute GFR Estimation in Children: Development and Validation of the GROW-GFR Equation. Front Pharmacol 2026.
- Minichmayr IK, et al. Model-informed precision dosing: State of the art and future perspectives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2024.115421
- Starp J, et al. Towards model-informed precision dosing of intravenous linezolid: a multicentre external evaluation of pharmacokinetic models in critically ill adults. CMI 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.032
- Wilkins AL, et al. Individualized vancomycin dosing in infants: prospective evaluation of an online dose calculator. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106728
- US National Kidney Foundation for different equations for kidney function estimates as related to drug dosing – estimating kidney function for medication related decisions: Frequently Asked Questions | National Kidney Foundation
23 August 2026, 10:00 pm - 49 minutes 12 secondsCommunicable E60: Quarterly catch-up (August 2026 edition)
In the second edition of 'Quarterly catch-up', CMI Communications editors Emily McDonald and Erin McCreary round-up the biggest news in infectious diseases and review clinical microbiology and infectious diseases studies published in the second quarter of 2026 [1-4]. From Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in solid-organ-transplant recipients to a double-blind randomised controlled trial reporting a new antibiotic for complicated urinary tract infections, Erin and Emily highlight four articles they found particularly noteworthy, and comment on whether the results can and should change clinical practice.
References
- Alanio A, et al. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in solid organ transplant recipients: a prospective observational cohort study, J Infect 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2026.106794
- Ramendra R, et al. Procalcitonin to guide 7 versus 14 days of antibiotics in bloodstream infections: a secondary analysis of the BALANCE trial, JAMA Netw Open 2026. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.20973
- Pai MP, et al. Challenging weight-tiered antibiotic prophylaxis in obese patients undergoing colorectal surgery using CT-derived body composition, CID 2026. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciag383
- Takahashi S, et al. Efficacy and safety of cefepime–nacubactam and aztreonam–nacubactam compared with imipenem–cilastatin for complicated urinary tract infection or acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis (Integral-1): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 2026. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00596-9
Further reading
- The SNAP Trial Group. Cefazolin for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. NEJM 2026. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2506905
- The SNAP Trial Group. Benzylpenicillin versus flucloxacillin or cloxacillin for the treatment of penicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SNAP): an international, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2026. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00761-0
- McCreary EK, et al. Communicable episode 26: SNAP out of it – rethinking anti-staphylococcal penicillins for S. aureus bacteremia, the SNAP trial PSSA/MSSA results. Communicable Podcast 2025. https://share.transistor.fm/s/2a3c3bb4
- Ilges D, et al. Anticalcitonin: limited utility of a context-dependent biomarker demonstrated in another real-world data set, CID 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag396
- Spellberg B. Procalcitonin–An enigmatic anxiolytic biomarker, JAMA Netw Open 2026. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.20978
9 August 2026, 10:00 pm - 1 hour 9 minutesCommunicable E59: 'Ask me anything' – EUCAST and CLSI leadership explain
In this episode of Communicable, Nav Narayanan and Thomas Tängdén kick off the first 'Ask me anything' episode, inviting EUCAST and CLSI leadership Sören Gatermann, Christian Giske and Amy Mathers to answer questions from our listeners. Together, they discuss the roles and operations of both organisations, similarities and differences between EUCAST and CLSI, how breakpoints and guidance documents are developed, set the record straight about the 'I' category, explain which data inform breakpoint decisions, and much more.
This episode was edited by Communicable's executive producer, Angela Huttner.
Further reading
Documents/resources:
- CLSI MicroFree, https://em100.edaptivedocs.net/Login.aspx?ru=1
- EUCAST: When there are no antifungal breakpoints
- EUCAST: When there are no breakpoints?
- Use_of_fosfomycin_iv_breakpoints_General_advice_20240528.pdf
- EUCAST: Definition of S, I and R
- EUCAST Guidance Document, “When there are no breakpoints”, https://www.eucast.org/bacteria/guidance-documents/
- EUCAST Guidance Document for “Rare Yeasts”, https://www.eucast.org/fungi-afst/guidance-documents/
Articles (alphabetical):
- Bixby ML, et al. Fosfomycin Disk Diffusion Testing among Klebsiella pneumoniae Results in Frequent Inner Colonies and Categorical Disagreement Based on Conflicting Breakpoint Organization Recommendations. Microbiol Spectr 2023. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03363-22
- DeMarco MG, et al. Impact of media brand on cefiderocol disk diffusion results. J Clin Microbiol 2025. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01648-24
- Giske CG, et al. Aminoglycoside breakpoints-the EUCAST approach and what this means for the clinician. CMI 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.015
- Mouton JW, et al. MIC-based dose adjustment: facts and fables. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkx427
- Narayanan N, et al. Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Breakpoints Against Enterobacterales: Rationale for Revision by the CLSI. Clin Infect Dis 2024. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae201
- Narayanan N, et al. Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Breakpoints Against Enterobacterales: Rationale for Revision by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Clin Infect Dis 2024. DOI:
- Pham Thanh D, et al. A novel ciprofloxacin-resistant subclade of H58 Salmonella Typhi is associated with fluoroquinolone treatment failure. eLife 2016. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.14003.001
- Smekal A. Swedish multicentre study of target attainments with β-lactams in the ICU: which MIC parameter should be used? J Antimicrob Chemother 2023. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkad327
- Turnidge J, et al. How to: the application and analysis of categorical agreement in antimicrobial susceptibility testing using EUCAST breakpoints. CMI 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2025.12.018
- Turnidge J, et al. Rationale for contemporary antimicrobial treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a narrative review. CMI Comms 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmicom.2025.105082
- Weinstein M, et al. The CLSI Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Background, Organization, Functions, and Processes. J Clin Microbiol 2020. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01864-19
26 July 2026, 10:00 pm - 54 minutes 27 secondsCommunicable E58: Reducing hospital-acquired pneumonia – the HAPPEN trial and how it happened
In this episode of Communicable, Angela Huttner and Josh Davis are joined by Brett Mitchell, Aline Wolfensberger and Lauren Clack to discuss the HAPPEN trial to prevent hospital-acquired pneumonia led by Mitchell--and the important studies leading up to it [1-3]. The episode also explores trial designs used in their research that are both creative and practical, such as stepped-wedge and implementation trials, and how these approaches can bridge the gap between research and real-world practice.
References
- Mitchell B, “The hospital acquired pneumonia prevention (HAPPEN) study: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial” in ESCMID Global 2026. https://online.escmid.org/media-6348-hospital-and-ventilator-associated-pneumonia-new-insights-on-prevention-diagnosis-and-treatment (Presentation).
- White NM, et al. Effectiveness of oral care for the prevention of non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAPPEN): a multicentre, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial in Australia. Lancet Infect Dis 2026. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(26)00235-5.
- Wolfensberger A, et al. Prevention of non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia in Switzerland: a type 2 hybrid effectiveness–implementation trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2023. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00812-X.
Further reading
- HAPPEN study website: Study overview and resources www.happenstudy.com
- Cassini A, et al. Burden of Six Healthcare-Associated Infections on European Population Health: Estimating Incidence-Based Disability-Adjusted Life Years through a Population Prevalence-Based Modelling Study. PLoS Med 2016. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002150.
- Pronovost P, et al. An Intervention to Decrease Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in the ICU. NEJM. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa061115.
- Bion J, et al. ‘Matching Michigan’: a 2-year stepped interventional programme to minimise central venous catheter-blood stream infections in intensive care units in England. BMJ Quality & Safety 2013. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001325.
- Dixon-Woods M, et al. Explaining Matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety program. Implementation Sci 2013. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-70.
- Clack L, et al. Hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies in infection prevention and infectious diseases: a narrative review. CMI 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2025.10.022.
- Hospital Acquired Pneumonia Prevention (HAPPEN) Study: Statistical Analysis Plan
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.08.14.25333719v1 - Oral care practices and hospital-acquired pneumonia prevention: A national survey of Australian nurses
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38724299/ - Nurses' experiences of providing oral care to hospitalised patients: A qualitative study
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40450434/
12 July 2026, 10:00 pm - 47 minutes 26 secondsCommunicable E57: We will make you love PK/PD, part 2
In this episode of Communicable, Thomas Tängdén and Rekha Pai Mangalore return for part 2 of the ‘We will make you love PK/PD’ series. In this round, they are joined by Iris Minichmayr (Austria) and Phil Selby (Australia) for a deep dive into how PK/PD data and principles can be used as integral clinical tools to support dosing decisions. They break down technical concepts of pharmacometrics such as population PK models, Monte Carlo simulations, probability of target attainment (PTA), and cumulative fraction of response (CFR), helping to make these approaches more accessible to everyday clinical practice.
This episode was edited by Kathryn Hostettler. The executive producer of Communicable is Angela Huttner.
Further reading
- Tängdén T, et al. Personalised patient management and infection prevention: current evidence and future perspectives. In: ESCMID Global 2025. Available on ESCMID Media: https://media.escmid.org/videos/01K7HWCJAHZ464H3XXK97SZ842
28 June 2026, 10:00 pm - 1 hour 5 minutesCommunicable E56: Frequentist vs Bayesian for clinical trial analysis – 99% probability you’ll want to listen to this
In this episode of Communicable, Emily McDonald and Josh Davis are joined by Roger Lewis (USA) and Ian Marschner (Australia) to compare and contrast Bayesian and frequentist statistical approaches. The panel discusses the fundamental principles of both methods, common misconceptions, and the extent to which they are often more similar than many realise. Together, they explore their use in clinical trial design, analysis, and reporting, including adaptive trials and sequential learning. Additional topics include sample size misconceptions, regulatory versus clinical thresholds, and the challenges of interpreting post hoc reanalyses of negative trials.
This episode was edited by Kathryn Hostettler and the executive producer of Communicable is Angela Huttner.
Further reading:
- Berry SM, et al. Bayesian Adaptive Methods for Clinical Trials (Chapman & Hall/CRC Biostatistics Series). Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2010.
- FDA Guidance Document: Use of Bayesian Methodology in Clinical Trials of Drug and Biological Products FDA, 2026, https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/use-bayesian-methodology-clinical-trials-drug-and-biological-products
- Lee TC, et al. Contextualizing the use of corticosteroids in severe Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia through a Bayesian lens. CMI Comms 2025, https://www.cmi-comms.org/article/S2950-5909(25)00082-4/fulltext
- Livingston EH and Lewis RJ. JAMA Guide to Statistics and Methods, https://jamaevidence.mhmedical.com/Book.aspx?bookId=2742
- Marschner I. Confidence distributions for treatment effects in clinical trials: Posteriors without priors. Stat Med 2024, doi: 10.1002/sim.10000.
- Whitehead J. The design and analysis of sequential clinical trials. Revised 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1997.
14 June 2026, 10:00 pm - 57 minutes 23 secondsCommunicable E55: Bonus episode – Bundibugyo ebolavirus outbreak
In this bonus episode of Communicable, hosts Anne-Grete Märtson and Angela Huttner invite Martin Grobusch (University of Amsterdam; ESCMID Emerging Infections Subcommittee) and Daniel Bausch (National University of Singapore, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, and Geneva Graduate Institute) to discuss the Bundibugyo ebolavirus outbreak currently ongoing in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda. Clinical and virological differences between Bundibugyo and Zaire ebolaviruses are discussed, as are the particular challenges for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention confronting healthcare workers of this outbreak. The episode accompanies two new publications in CMI Communications and CMI:
- Gupta N, Mora-Rillo M, Gkrania-Klotsas E, et al. Bundibugyo ebolavirus (BDBV): what first responders/clinicians need to know. CMI Communications, 2026; 2 (DOI: 10.1016/j.cmicom.2026.105207)
- Gupta N, Marta Mora-Rillo, Gkrania-Klotsas E, et al. Bundibugyo ebolavirus outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda: rapid assessment from the ESCMID Emerging Infections Subcommittee. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2026 (DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2026.05.042)
7 June 2026, 10:00 pm - 55 minutes 55 secondsCommunicable E54: ESCMID Global Late Breakers, part 2
Our editors – Marc Bonten, Erin McCreary, Anne-Grete Märtson, Angela Huttner, and Josh Davis – are back for part two of the ESCMID Global Late Breakers series, summarising five more late-breaking trials presented at ESCMID Global 2026. They discuss the trials' strengths and weaknesses, and whether their results should change practice.
The five trials presented in this half of the series are listed below, and links to their respective sessions can be watched and rewatched on the ESCMID Global Virtual Platform. Links to corresponding abstracts and publications where available are provided as well.
Conflict of interest/involvement in the trials:
- Marc Bonten was the chair of the E.mbrace trial's steering committee
- Josh Davis is global co-lead of the SNAP trial
- Josh Davis was a site investigator on the E.mbrace trial
- Angela Huttner was an independent/unpaid member of the E.mbrace trial's steering committee and an investigator on the precursor phase 1 trial testing the E. coli vaccine
PROCALBAN trial (Late-breaking clinical trials in sepsis management)
- Chowdhury F, et al. Use of Procalcitonin Point-Of-Care Testing to Guide De-Escalation of Antibiotic Therapy in Adult Sepsis Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in Bangladesh: A Randomised Controlled Open-Label Trial, Preprints with The Lancet, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.6541698
BENEFICIAL trial (Late-breaking clinical trials in sepsis management)
- De Cock PA, et al. Bedside model-informed precision dosing of vancomycin in severely ill neonates and children in Belgium (the BENEFICIAL trial): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health, doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(25)00385-2
SNAP trial (Late-breaking clinical trials in sepsis management)
- Bowen A. Adjunctive clindamycin for treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a randomised controlled trial within the S. aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP), abstract
Adjunctive betamethasone treatment of hypoxemic adults hospitalised with Mycoplasma pneumoniae community-acquired pneumonia: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial (Late-breaking research from The Lancet)
- Hagman K, et al. Adjunctive betamethasone treatment of hypoxaemic adults hospitalised with Mycoplasma pneumoniae community-acquired pneumonia: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101610
E.mbrace trial (Vaccines: landmark trials and preventive immunisation)
- Cohen CA, et al. Randomised phase III trial of a 9-valent vaccine (ExPEC9V) for prevention of invasive Escherichia coli disease (IED) in older adults (E.mbrace), abstract
The Swiss multicentre phase 1, first-in-human trial testing the conjugate E. coli vaccine:- Huttner A et al. Safety, immunogenicity, and preliminary clinical efficacy of a vaccine against extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli in women with a history of recurrent urinary tract infection: a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1b trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2017: May;17(5):528-537
31 May 2026, 10:00 pm - 1 hour 9 secondsCommunicable E53: ESCMID Global Late Breakers, part 1
The ESCMID Global Late Breakers series returns to Communicable! Five CMI Communications editors – Marc Bonten, Josh Davis, Angela Huttner, Anne-Grete Märtson, and Erin McCreary – handpicked five late-breaking trials presented at ESCMID Global 2026 to summarise their findings and discuss whether the results will change their practice. This is part one of the two-part series.
Trials presented are listed below and links to their respective sessions can be watched and rewatched on the ESCMID Global Virtual Platform. Links to corresponding publications, if available, and mentioned related articles are provided as well.
The FAST trial (Late-breaking research from JAMA)
- Banerjee R, et al. Fast Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Gram-Negative Bacteremia. The FAST Randomized Clinical Trial, doi: 10.1001/jama.2026.5487
- Srinivasan A. A Multinational Trial of Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Is FASTer Better?, doi: 10.1001/jama.2026.5504
The CEFMEC trial (Poster session)
- Hayakawa K, et al. Effectiveness of cefmetazole versus meropenem for invasive urinary tract infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2023, doi: 10.1128/aac.00510-23
The COBRA trial (Late-breaking trials in surgical infection prevention)
- Overdevest AG, et al. Antibiotic treatment for 1 day versus 4-7 days in patients with acute cholangitis after adequate endoscopic biliary drainage (COBRA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09524-7
The DOTS trial, a secondary analysis (Late-breaking research from JAMA)
- Lodise, TP, et al. Pharmacokinetics of Dalbavancin in Complicated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Secondary Analysis of the DOTS Randomized Clinical Trial, JAMA 2026, doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.11652
- Walls G, et al. Patient-reported Perceptions, Experiences, and Preferences Around Intravenous and Oral Antibiotics for the Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Descriptive Qualitative Study, Clin Infect Dis 2026, doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaf522
- Turner NA , et al. Dalbavancin for treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: the DOTS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2025, doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.12543
Maribavir for clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection in hematopoietic cell transplantation: a real-world retrospective international study of the Infectious Disease Working Party of EBMT (Late-breaking research from The Lancet)
- Paviglianiti A, et al. Maribavir for clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection in haematopoietic cell transplant recipients in Europe: a real-world multicentre retrospective registry study. Lancet 2026. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(26)00144-1
17 May 2026, 10:00 pm - 1 hour 25 secondsCommunicable E52: ESCMID Global Trials, PETER PEN and ASTARTE
In this collaborative episode of Breakpoints and Communicable, the hosts revisit the “trial run” session from ESCMID Global, a format designed to facilitate critical discussion of major infectious diseases trials. This episode focuses on two studies addressing bloodstream infections caused by third‑generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales [1].
Mical Paul (Rambam Health Care Campus, Israel) joins the podcast to discuss the PETER PEN trial [1,2], comparing piperacillin/tazobactam with meropenem, including its design, interim analyses, and interpretation alongside prior data such as MERINO. The episode also features Jesús Rodríguez‑Baño (University of Seville, Spain), who presents a post hoc analysis of the ASTARTE trial [1,3], comparing temocillin and carbapenems.
This episode was edited by Lacy Worden and was peer reviewed by Jeanette Bouchard (Duke Antimicrobial Stewardship Outreach Network (DASON) Durham, NC, USA).
References
- Paul, M., & Rodríguez-Baño, J. (2026, April 20). The trial run: treatment of ESBL bacteraemia - off to never-never land. [Presentation]. ESCMID Global 2026, Munich, Germany. ESCMID Global Virtual Platform.
- Bitterman R, Koppel F, Mussini C, et al. Piperacillin-tazobactam versus meropenem for treatment of bloodstream infections caused by third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a study protocol for a non-inferiority open-label randomised controlled trial (PeterPen). BMJ Open. 2021;11(2):e040210. Published 2021 Feb 8. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040210
- Marín-Candón A, Rosso-Fernández CM, Bustos de Godoy N, et al. Temocillin versus meropenem for the targeted treatment of bacteraemia due to third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (ASTARTÉ): protocol for a randomised, pragmatic trial [Internet]. BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 27;11(9):e049481. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049481
Further reading
- Harris PNA, et al. Effect of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs Meropenem on 30-Day Mortality for Patients With E coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection and Ceftriaxone Resistance: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;320(10):984–994. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12163.
8 May 2026, 6:27 am - 1 minute 8 secondsA message to listeners, 4 May 2026
This is a short message to Communicable listeners to inform them that the next episode will be released on Friday, 8 May, as it is a collaboration episode with Breakpoints, the podcast of the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. It will cover the two trials presented in Munich during ESCMID Global's late-breaker Trial Run session.
3 May 2026, 10:00 pm - More Episodes? Get the App