Will Wilkinson discusses a biography he was hired to write about Princeton physicist William Happer, combining four chapters of life story with a climate-focused second half arguing science has been politicized. He describes Happer’s decades-long career, including inventing the sodium laser guide star for missile defense and work adapted for medical lung imaging, plus Happer’s “trust and verify” approach and skepticism of models over measurements. They cover Happer’s CO2 Coalition role, controversy at Princeton, colleagues’ contributions (e.g., Lindzen, Koonin, Ridd), and comparisons to Lysenkoism and past scientific dissent. The author stresses curiosity, civil communication, and avoiding fear-driven climate hysteria.

00:00 Meet Will Wilkinson

00:27 Writing Happer Biography

01:45 Happer Science Legacy

02:42 Climate Views Adaptation

03:29 Laser Guide Star Explained

05:12 Trust and Verify Mindset

06:04 Princeton Controversy

07:14 Famous Colleagues Stories

09:18 Childhood and Formation

10:58 Standing Up for Science

13:28 Lysenkoism and Dogma

16:38 Outsiders and Discovery

21:15 Curiosity and Measuring

23:25 CO2 Politics and Money

24:45 Book Release and Coalition

25:43 Rogan Episode and Outreach

27:07 Documentary and Prior Bio

28:33 Reluctant Scientist Profile

30:10 Working Life at Princeton

31:05 Red Team Blue Team Fallout

32:01 Middle Ground Climate Debate

34:46 Colleagues and Reef Controversy

37:29 Skepticism After COVID

41:38 Single Source of Truth Quotes

44:24 Kindness Over Division

48:41 Hope Against Climate Hysteria

50:23 Meaningful Memoirs and AI

54:04 Wrap Up and Thanks

Will Wilkinson’s web site: https://www.meaningfulmemoirs.com/

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Jonathan Cohler presents a newly submitted paper using mass conservation, isotopic signatures (delta 13C), and multiple datasets to apply the Keeling relation and infer a consistent intercept near -13.2‰ across sites and time spans. He argues this makes fossil fuels (signature ~-28‰) at most 26% of net atmospheric CO2 change and, using preindustrial constraints, essentially ~0–1.3%, contradicting claims by IPCC, NASA, NOAA, EPA, and the CO2 Coalition. He says CO2 residence time is ~3.8 years and attributes rising CO2 to natural temperature-driven ocean/soil outgassing. He criticizes the CO2 Coalition for conflating accounting identities with causation, describes harassment, and says he resigned.

00:00 New Paper Claim

01:29 Three Inputs Setup

03:25 Isotope Signatures 101

06:05 Keeling Relation Explained

10:17 Datasets And Intercepts

13:38 Solving For Fossil Fraction

22:22 Why Fossil Dominance Fails

25:16 Rejecting The Conclusion

28:04 Carbon Cycle Turnover

31:45 What Drives CO2 Rise

33:56 Ancient CO2 And Whataboutism

36:53 CO2 Coalition Errors Teaser

37:38 Accounting vs Causation

39:23 Feynman on Conservation

40:37 What Proves Causality

41:37 Atmospheric Balance Equation

42:53 Coalition Paper Misreads

46:25 Molecules Not Labeled

48:08 Residuals Aren't Attribution

49:56 Isotopes Discriminate Sources

51:27 Airborne Fraction Fallacy

53:41 Retention and Cycle Time

56:02 Harassment and Resignation

01:03:18 CO2 Forcing and Policy Costs

01:08:51 X Feedback and Contact

01:13:38 Wrap Up and Links

https://x.com/cohler

https://papers.jcohler.com/

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

James Tooley describes two decades researching “low-cost private schools” serving poor families in India, Africa, rural China, and war-torn countries, arguing parents choose them because government/public schools often abandon children. He cites widespread enrollment (e.g., majorities in parts of Lagos and Kampala), higher standardized test performance, no gender bias, affordability around 10% of family spending, and sustainability as small businesses. He now finds a similar U.S. phenomenon in hybrid/micro schools, visiting examples in Pine Ridge (Onward Learning), rural Mississippi, refugee-serving Clarkston, and rural Oregon, and surveying 5,390 parents: about 4% use low-tuition private schools. He discusses limited, careful roles for philanthropy, and worries about dependence on government ESAs.

00:00 Meet James Tooley

01:03 Hyderabad Discovery

03:25 Government School Reality

05:37 Makoko Lagos Expedition

07:49 Kibera Ghana China Proof

11:49 Beautiful Tree Thesis

13:04 War Torn Africa Schools

15:48 Five Key Features

21:06 Federations And Pushback

22:02 Low Cost Schools In America

25:53 Pine Ridge Onward Learning

29:46 Mississippi Trailer School

33:19 Refugees And Oregon Example

36:08 National Survey Findings

41:45 Philanthropy And Donations

43:26 Quality Assurance Debate

46:33 School Choice ESA Concerns

49:57 Where To Follow James

50:46 Final Reflections

The Beautiful Tree: https://a.co/d/032zFHgW

Really Good Schools: Global Lessons for High-Caliber, Low-Cost Education: https://a.co/d/01VMoY3r

https://x.com/james_tooley

https://uk.linkedin.com/in/james-tooley-320a8410

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Tom Harris argues Canada’s claim of warming twice the global average is unreliable because northern data coverage is sparse and “homogenized” station adjustments may exaggerate trends. He questions the meaning of average temperature and says Canada’s record shows a step change around 1998, consistent with El Niño and possibly the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, not steady greenhouse-gas forcing. He cites extreme-weather records peaking in the 1930s and references Heartland’s Climate Change Reconsidered and Roger Pielke’s datasets as showing little detected change in many extremes. Harris then describes organizing local activists, using Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, rehearsing questions, and bypassing media censorship to challenge municipal climate policies.

00:00 Meet Tom Harris

00:19 Canada Warming Claims

00:41 Is Warming Bad

03:21 So Called Averages

05:13 Overlapping Ranges

08:06 Why Start 1948

11:08 Heat Records Evidence

11:54 Sparse Arctic Stations

14:39 Homogenized Adjustments

17:00 Step Change Not CO2

18:57 Hickey Speaks Out

21:59 Natural Cycles Theory

22:59 PR Versus Evidence

24:22 Extreme Weather Database

25:56 Heartland Reports

28:32 Warmer Means Milder

31:07 Pielke Teaser

31:19 Global Extremes Database

31:51 P Factor Explained

32:30 Translator Not Climatologist

33:33 Drilling Into Continents

34:48 Wildfire History Context

37:23 Heatwave Data Concerns

38:31 Local Activism Playbook

40:06 Alinsky Rules In Action

42:49 Debate Questions And Ridicule

47:16 Training Volunteers Nationwide

51:59 Beating Media Censorship

53:55 Groups Funding And Contact

56:17 Practice Sessions And Wins

57:43 Wrap Up Resources

 icsc-canada.com

 sensiblechange.ca

https://x.com/TomHarrisICSC

https://drtomharris.substack.com/

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Dai Ato presents findings from three papers arguing atmospheric CO2 rise is largely natural, claiming multivariate analyses reject human emissions as a significant predictor of annual CO2 increases while sea surface temperature (SST) is significant. He says detrended annual-change comparisons show emissions vs CO2 change has near-zero correlation, while SST retains moderate correlation, consistent with CO2 solubility in water. He also claims ice-core CO2 reconstructions are incorrect and that temperature leads specific humidity, rejecting CO2–water vapor positive feedback; absorbed shortwave and total solar irradiance correlate with SST while CO2 is negligible or negative. In Q&A, he expects the Keeling Curve to keep rising, COVID emission drops to have little effect, and rejects a stable 280 ppm preindustrial CO2.

00:00 Intro And Agenda

00:39 Three Paper Overview

04:01 CO2 Rise Not Human

07:05 Detrending Spurious Links

10:33 Water Vapor Feedback Tested

13:19 Solar And Albedo Drivers

17:12 Past Evidence SST Leads

21:50 Global Temperature Averaging

23:58 Key Takeaways And DOE

26:04 Why I Wrote These Papers

33:06 Ice Core Reconstruction Issues

34:17 Closing Thoughts And Q&A

https://x.com/info45037254

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Ron Clutz continues a three-part framework on climate change: humans cause warming, warming is dangerous, and government can stop it. He argues observed warming can be explained by post–Little Ice Age recovery plus multidecadal oscillations and solar-orbital effects, and says “alarmists” deny these. He describes a taxpayer-funded “climate scare machine” and cites a Climate Change Business Journal estimate of a $3.4T/year global climate industry. Using Joseph D’Aleo’s materials, he disputes claims about heatwaves, storms, droughts, wildfires, ice loss, ocean acidification, health, and food, then focuses on Arctic sea ice cycles and sea-level model projections versus tide gauges. He stresses climate is local (Köppen zones) and says climate policies are wasteful, ineffective, and harmful, citing project failures, costs, and energy poverty.

00:00 Framework Recap

01:07 Natural Warming Factors

03:56 Climate Scare Machine

07:59 Eleven Empty Claims

13:56 Polar Bears and Sea Ice

20:00 Sea Level Scare Tactics

28:27 Climates Are Local

35:13 Warming Impacts Summary

35:59 Can Governments Stop It

37:56 Energy Transition Reality

40:19 Why Hydrocarbons Rule

42:06 Energy Mix Big Picture

43:47 Trillions Visualized

45:22 Waste One Missing Funds

45:59 Waste Two Project Failures

48:35 Waste Three Blade Graveyards

49:13 Waste Four Operational Collapse

50:18 Hydrogen And Biofuels

51:32 Fear Sells Climate Policy

53:06 Policy Weapons And Results

55:51 Energy Poverty And Jobs

59:09 Rare Metals And Land Use

01:01:40 Better Priorities Consensus

01:02:29 Absurd Costly Pointless

01:03:59 Cartoons And Media Satire

01:09:33 Arctic Update And Data

01:13:28 Wrap Up Links And Wildfires

https://rclutz.com/

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Henrik Svensmark discusses how solar activity modulates cosmic rays, which ionize the atmosphere and can help form aerosols that grow into cloud condensation nuclei, potentially altering clouds and Earth’s energy balance. He describes lab experiments showing more aerosols with increased ionization, critiques models that predicted no cloud effect, and presents observations from Forbush decreases where drops in cosmic rays are followed days later by reduced aerosols, cloud changes, and radiative-budget responses. He argues solar-cycle forcing may be ~1–1.5 W/m² and could affect CO2 sensitivity. On longer timescales, he links supernova-driven cosmic-ray variations to glaciations, ocean temperature, organic carbon burial, oxygen production, and biodiversity, while noting funding and career pressures.

00:00 Cosmic Rays and Clouds

00:42 Meet Henrik Svensmark

02:59 Solar Activity Basics

03:31 IPCC Forcing Debate

05:13 Sunspots and Cosmic Rays

07:03 Cosmic Ray Showers

08:55 Isotopes as Solar Proxies

11:48 Climate Correlations

15:17 Ocean Heat Amplification

17:55 Clouds as Amplifier

19:39 How CCN Form

22:22 Testing in Chambers

24:59 Models vs Reality

27:52 Forbush Natural Experiments

36:14 Fixing the Physics

41:17 Billion Year Timescales

42:08 Galactic Spiral Arms

44:02 Star Formation Setup

44:33 Open Clusters Explained

45:57 Mapping Nearby Clusters

46:53 Supernovas Meet Climate

48:27 Zooming Into Ice Ages

51:31 Nutrients And Carbon Isotopes

53:54 Organic Burial Correlation

55:15 Deep Time Starbursts

57:12 Oxygen And Complex Life

59:51 Dwarf Galaxies Trigger Stars

01:02:18 Fossils And Diversity Curves

01:05:13 Shelf Area Drives Richness

01:09:04 Area Normalization Test

01:11:34 Big Picture Conclusions

01:13:35 Funding And Career Risks

01:22:15 Critiques And Solar Events

01:25:16 Wrap Up And Farewell

Svensmark: The Cloud Mystery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANMTPF1blpQ

The Chilling Stars [2008]: https://www.amazon.com/Chilling-Stars-New-Theory-Climate/dp/1840468661

Papers: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2843-3417

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Randall Bock argues opioids have dual legal and illicit markets and that most prescribed users don’t become street addicts. He recounts refusing drug-seekers (“Dr. No”) and later using buprenorphine as a temporary bridge, advocating a 4–6 month taper to sobriety rather than lifelong “maintenance.” He claims methadone maintenance, originated at Rockefeller University and expanded nationally via Nixon-era policy and Medicaid incentives, aimed to curb New York City crime but instead seeded the first wave of the opioid crisis and spread heroin use. He challenges the “addiction as disease/insulin” analogy, cites Vietnam vet recovery and Rat Park, and promotes his book “Withdraw to Freedom.”

00:00 Opioid Desert Intro

01:06 Two Marketplaces Theory

02:01 Doctor No Stories

03:29 Suboxone And DATA 2000

04:50 Maintenance Therapy Critique

06:22 New York City Sets Stage

08:04 Bridge To Sobriety Plan

10:47 Long Boom And Opioid Spike

14:24 Classic Narcotic Control Era

17:26 Harm Reduction And Methadone

18:43 OxyContin Myth Busting

19:48 Addiction As Exposure

23:28 Rockefeller Methadone Origins

26:40 Crime Control Not Cure

28:14 Why Methadone Feels Dopey

31:59 National Spread And Incentives

36:46 Did Crime Drop Actually

38:46 Equality Of Misery

40:49 Dealers Adapt And Expand

43:03 Dopesick Narrative Setup

43:36 Methadone First Wave

45:22 Medicalization Lessons

48:15 Disease Model Tested

50:20 Replacement vs Proclivity

53:29 Russia and Hard Truths

55:38 Rat Park Recovery

01:00:14 Economy and Despair

01:03:18 Bock Taper and Five Fs

01:09:28 Board Backlash

01:11:28 Book Launch Pitch

01:13:51 Incentives and COVID Parallels

01:19:01 Mental Health Parity

01:22:43 Wrap Up and Dual Path

https://randybock.com/

https://x.com/@DrRandallBock

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Jim Lakely, EVP and communications director at The Heartland Institute, describes Heartland’s free-market mission and its global role “pushing back on climate alarmism,” plus his weekly Climate Realism Show. He recounts Heartland’s 16 climate conferences since 2008 (300+ speakers, videos online), efforts to invite opposing views, and claims the IPCC’s mandate is to emphasize human influence. They discuss natural forcings, scientific uncertainty, warming since the Little Ice Age, and skepticism about “global average temperature.” Lakely cites funding pressures in academia, conference disruptions by Climate Defiance, and notes Roy Spencer’s satellite data work. He recounts “Fakegate,” alleging Peter Gleick stole documents and forged a memo. They also discuss COPs, social-media throttling, and AI’s energy demands weakening climate media funding.

00:00 Meet Jim Lakely

00:32 Heartland Climate Mission

01:34 Inside Climate Conferences

04:25 Debate And The IPCC

07:06 Natural Forcings Focus

09:32 Warming And Perspective

12:23 Young Skeptics Rising

15:40 Disruptions And Threats

20:44 Will Happer Spotlight

23:25 Models Funding And Media

28:01 Journalism Background

29:13 Congress Reality Check

30:39 Oval Office With Bush

32:44 Climate Beat Back Then

35:09 Momentum After 2024

38:32 AI Needs Real Energy

40:24 Fakegate Scandal Recap

47:03 Inside UN COP Meetings

48:57 Social Media Censorship

51:38 YouTube UN Banners

53:02 Closing Thoughts Freedom

https://x.com/jlakely

See all Heartland “International Conference on Climate Change” videos here: https://climateconferences.heartland.org/

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Thomas Kurz discusses chapters from his book Why There Is No Climate Crisis, citing positive reviews, then explains the greenhouse effect and argues CO2’s warming is limited and logarithmic. He claims doubling CO2 yields about 3 W/m² effective forcing, or ~0.9°C via Stefan–Boltzmann calculations, and says even burning all known fossil fuel reserves would add under ~1°C. He argues “climate crisis” claims rely on compounded positive feedbacks in IPCC models, but says observations show models overpredict warming, relative humidity aloft is declining, and a predicted tropical hotspot is missing. He attributes discrepancies to cloud/aerosol cooling, proposing an Earth “thermostat” and net slightly negative feedback.

00:00 Guest and Book Update

02:31 Greenhouse Effect Basics

04:53 CO2 Absorption and Saturation

07:38 Four Ways to Calculate Forcing

17:11 Convert Forcing to Temperature

21:19 Logarithmic Warming Limits

24:20 Fossil Fuels and Max Warming

28:13 Feedbacks Behind the Crisis

32:55 Models vs Observations

41:30 Clouds and Cooling Evidence

55:51 Earth Thermostat Conclusion

57:52 Q&A and Scientific Method

01:01:33 Wrap Up and Farewell

“Why There is No Climate Crisis: The Surprising Evidence You Should Know”: https://a.co/d/05rKxsYU

https://www.whynoclimatecrisis.com/

Email: [email protected]

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Ray Sanders updates his Surface Stations project to classify all 385 UK Met Office weather stations using WMO siting classes, claiming 88% are class 3–5 and 112 meet no regulations, including many in walled or private gardens and car parks. He argues poor siting, degraded maintenance after automation, and rapid platinum resistance thermometers in Stevenson screens create spikes and non-comparable records versus older liquid-in-glass methods. He alleges rounding/conversion issues, data from non-existent “climate averages” sites, refusals under FOI, and deletion of queried webpages. He presents analyses of stable long-term records at Wye and effects from a solar farm at RAF Lyneham, and plans more reconstructions with helpers.

00:00 Project Update Intro

01:49 WMO Siting Classes Explained

03:23 Most Stations Fail Standards

05:54 Walled Gardens Hotspots

11:55 Car Parks and Heat Sources

13:58 Thermometers and Response Time

18:27 Stevenson Screen Meets PRT

20:36 Sampling Rates and Spikes

24:45 Fahrenheit to Celsius Rounding

28:00 Maintenance and Automation Decay

32:30 Phantom Stations and FOI Fight

37:59 Allies and Data Deletions

42:16 Searching for Good Stations

42:30 Best Station Locations

43:39 Wye Data Deep Dive

44:59 Anomalies And Baselines

46:36 Manual Records Reveal 1930s

50:00 Solar Farm Heat Jump

51:19 Dyce Vs Craibstone

55:06 Met Office Classification Errors

59:53 Questionable Data Practices

01:02:21 US Climate Reference Network

01:07:38 Why He Started The Crusade

01:13:53 Focus On Great Britain

01:14:51 Thanks And Wrap Up

https://x.com/RaySand17710097

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1