Russian Girl gets introduced to the nature of our flat earth.

Current Satellite access salesman , former UN Youth liaison for Outer Space , former NASA employee has a laid back dialogue with Flat Earthers 

Koolaid Drinking And Space Pill Popping IRL Space Evangelist Vs Flat Earth

Just an Average dude gets the full exposition on what flat earthers experience and their critical thinking approach.

Average Glober Peaks Behind The Flat Earth Curtain

Test The Earth Yourself Or Be An NPC
Conversation on the 24/7 Flat Earth Discord with an NPC

FLAT EARTH
It’s your responsibility to know what’s true not the experts.

Don’t out-source your brain.

Tyranny of Experts

Discussion With Another Physics PHD

Overall Summary

The conversation begins with a foundational question about the nature of pressure, comparing how it functions in liquids versus gases. This quickly evolves into a core debate between a speaker with a Ph.D. in physics and a group of skeptics on a Flat Earth Discord server. The central point of contention is whether a column of gas creates pressure due to its own weight in the same way a column of water does.

The skeptics argue that the kinetic theory of gases and the lack of a defined “surface” mean that gravity does not hold gas down, and therefore gas pressure cannot exist outside of a sealed container. The physicist counters by explaining the principles of atmospheric pressure, intermolecular forces, and thermodynamics, arguing that the weight of the air above is precisely what creates pressure at lower altitudes. The discussion delves into the philosophy of science, the validity of scientific models, and the burden of proof. The skeptics cite specific amateur experiments, such as laser tests over long distances of water, which they claim empirically disprove the Earth’s curvature. The conversation concludes with a sociological debate about why such “evidence” is not accepted by mainstream science, with the physicist suggesting a global conspiracy is less likely than errors in the experiments themselves.

Justification For A Flat Earth

Summary of the Discussion

A person new to the concept of a flat Earth asks a proponent (DJ) to explain the difference between the flat Earth and globe Earth models and to provide evidence.

The Flat Earther argues that their primary evidence is direct, everyday experience: the ground feels stationary, water surfaces appear perfectly flat, and the horizon looks flat. He contrasts this with the globe model, which he describes as a “belief system” taught from a young age that contradicts our senses. He claims Globe Earthers experience a flat, motionless world but believe it’s a rapidly spinning, curving sphere.

The newcomer counters by suggesting that the Earth is simply too large for its curvature to be perceptible to a small human. The Flat Earther agrees this is the standard explanation but claims that when objective measurements are taken, no curvature is found. He uses the example of a 10-mile lake, explaining that according to globe mathematics, there should be 66 feet of curvature, which would hide the opposite shore. However, he asserts that in reality, one can see straight across, which he presents as proof that the Earth is flat. The conversation concludes with the newcomer asking about the group’s belief in NASA.

Do you believe Nature or Do you believe NASA?

• 00:00 – 05:24 – The Windmill Anomaly: The debate begins with an analysis of a photograph of windmills across water. While one participant (Joshua) argues it shows Earth’s curvature, the main speaker points out that a farther windmill appears higher than a closer one, which contradicts the expected geometry of a globe and the principles of linear perspective. The effect is proposed to be a mirage caused by atmospheric refraction.
• 05:25 – 12:43 – Questioning Evidence & Small-Scale Proof: The authenticity of the windmill photo is challenged. The discussion then moves to a crucial experiment on a 1,000-foot lake—a known flat surface. The experiment shows a boat being obscured from the bottom up at a distance far shorter than the mathematically predicted horizon, suggesting the phenomenon is optical and not dependent on a curved Earth.
• 12:44 – 20:40 – The “Black Swan” Argument & Initial Debate: The primary piece of evidence, the “Black Swan” footage, is introduced. From a camera height of one foot, oil rigs 6 and 9 miles away are visible, despite the globe model predicting a horizon of only 1.2 miles. The key argument is that the visual horizon is clearly behind the oil rigs, which the speakers argue is definitive proof that Earth’s curvature is not obscuring them. The debate with Joshua becomes intense here.
• 20:41 – 34:10 – The Aegis Radar System: After Joshua leaves for the first time, the speakers introduce another line of argument: the Aegis Combat System. They claim this naval radar’s ability to detect and track sea-skimming missiles flying just feet above the water at ranges of over 45 nautical miles is technologically impossible if the Earth has its accepted curvature.
• 34:11 – 45:10 – Explaining the “False Horizon”: The speakers elaborate on their explanation for these visual phenomena. They argue that temperature and humidity gradients in the air create a “false horizon” through light refraction and total internal reflection, similar to a fiber-optic duct. They formalize their argument using Modus Tollens: if the Earth is a globe, the horizon must be at a certain distance; the horizon is demonstrably not at that distance; therefore, the Earth is not a globe.
• 45:11 – 1:01:10 – The Final Confrontation: Joshua rejoins the debate. The argument immediately becomes chaotic again, focusing on whether the horizon is a sharp, defined line or a “gradual” effect. Joshua’s refusal to directly answer whether the horizon is in front of or behind the rigs leads to him being muted and leaving the discussion for good.
• 1:01:11 – 1:11:43 (End) – Conclusion: With the main opponent gone, the remaining speakers conclude the debate. They recap their points, mocking the globe arguments as nonsensical in the face of the visual evidence. They reinforce their position that phenomena like the Black Swan are not anomalies but are consistent, observable proofs that the horizon is an optical effect, not a physical curvature.
  
  Glober Grasps At Straws And Claims False Horizons

Sunny on the Planes tells a new comer how the earth is known to be flat

Absolute Noob Learns About The Reality Of Flat Earth Part 2